Assessment of the Possibility of Transition Power Boilers to Alternative Solid Fuels by Modeling Combustion Processes

. Currently, the transition to alternative fuel during the operation of thermal power plants (TPP) occurs due to the reduction and unreliability of coal supplies, deterioration of its quality, proposals for the use of cheaper fuel, tightening environmental requirements. Alternative fuel means such coal, for the use of which the boilers have not been designed during their design or reconstruction, as well as coal that has not previously undergone industrial or experimental combustion at this TPP. When converting boilers to alternative fuels, the main problems are: slag of the furnace shields and heating surfaces located above the furnace; fouling of convective heating surfaces; instability of non-designed fuel combustion; abrasion of the convective part of boilers; reduction of environmental performance; change in operating conditions of dust preparation, slag removal, ash collection and fuel supply systems. Before conducting experimental combustion of alternative fuels, it is advisable to carry out a preliminary assessment of its combustion possibility using numerical simulation, which makes it possible to identify emerging problems in advance. The most important factor in assessing the possibility of using alternative fuels is the influence of thermal performance, fuel and ash characteristics on the slagging of heating surfaces in the furnace. For a long time, the ability of ash to slagging was determined by the results of a fusibility test by changing the shape of a pyramid of ash particles during its gradual heating to various states according to the specific temperatures, viz. the initial deformation temperature, the softening temperature, the hemispherical temperature. The fusibility test cannot predict the real situation that occurs during the boiler operation. In addition, it does not allow ranking coals according to their tendency to slagging, which is necessary for the preliminary selection of alternative coal. Therefore, it is proposed to use the Watt - Fereday method with Bomkamp’s refinement for calculating the slagging index for ranking coals according to suitability as non-design fuels.

1. Maidanik M. N., Verbovetskii E. K., Tugov A. N. (2021) Preliminary Assessment of the Possibility to Shift Thermal Power Plant Boilers for Burning Alternative Coal. Thermal Engineering, 68 (9), 690–697. https://doi.org/10.1134/S004060152108005X

2. Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation (2020) State Report on the State and Use of Mineral Resources of the Russian Federation in 2019. Moscow. 494 (in Russian).

3. Bogomolov V. V., Artem'eva N. V., Alekhnovich A. N., Novitskii N. V., Timofeeva N. A. (2004) Energy Coals of the Eastern Part of Russia and Kazakhstan. Chelyabinsk, UralVTI. 304 (in Russian).

4. Kuznetsov N. V., Mitor V.V., Dubovskii I. E., Karasina E. S. (eds.) (1998) Thermal Calculation of Boilers (Standard Method). Sankt-Peterburg. 259 (in Russian).

5. Alekhnovich A. N. (2013) Slagging of Pulverized Coal Power Boilers. Moscow. 112 (in Russian)

6. Degereji M. U. Ingham D.B., Ma L., Pourkashanian M., Williams A. (2012) Numerical Assessment of Coals/Blends Slagging Potential in Pulverized Coal Boilers. Fuel, 102, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.028

7. Watt J. D., Ferreday F. (1969) The Flow Properties of Slag Formed from the Ashes of British Coals. Part 1: Viscosity of Homogeneous Liquid Slag in Relation to Slag Composition. Journal of the Institute of Fuel, 42, 99–103.

8. Santhosh Raaj S., Arumugam S., Muthukrishnan M., Krishnamoorthy S., Anantharaman N. (2016) Characterization of Coal Blends for Effective Utilization in Thermal Power Plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 102, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.035

9. Ulloa C., Borrego A.G., Helle S., Gordon A. L., García X. (2005) Char Characterization and DTF Assays as Tools to Predict Burnout of Coal Blends in Power Plants. Fuel, 84 (2–3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.08.008

10. Hashimoto N., Shirai H. (2014) Numerical Simulation of Sub-Bituminous Coal and Bituminous Coal Mixed Combustion Employing Tabulated-Devolatilization-Process Model. Energy, 71, 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.091

11. Haas J., Tamura M., Weber R. (2001) Characterisation of Coal Blends for Pulverised Fuel Combustion. Fuel, 80 (9), 1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00216-7

12. Moon C., Sung Y., Ahn S., Kim T., Choi G., Kim D. (2013) Thermochemical and Combustion Behaviors of Coals of Different Ranks and Their Blends for Pulverized-Coal Combustion. Applied Thermal Engineering, 54 (1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.01.009

13. Tong C., Yang X., Chen G., Zhang Y., Chen L., Zhou Y., He T., Jin B. (2021) Experimental Investigation for the Combustion Characteristics of Blends of Three Kinds of Coal. Fuel, 300, 120937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120937

14. Yarmolchick Yu. Р., Schröger R., Haberfelner H., Pichler M., Kostić D., Moroz G. V. (2020) Combined Combustion of Various Industrial Waste Flows in Boiler Furnaces. Part 1. Energetika. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations. 63 (3), 236–252 https://doi.org10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-3-236-252 (in Russian).

15. Vuthalura R., Vuthaluru H. B. (2006) Modelling of a Wall-Fired Furnace for Different Operating Conditions Using FLUENT. Fuel Processing Technology, 87 (7), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.01.004

16. Al-Abbas A.H., Naser J. (2013) Computational Fluid Dynamic Modelling of a 550 MW Tangentially-Fired Furnace under Different Operating Conditions. Procedia Engineering, 56, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.137

17. Yarmolchick Yu. P., Schröger R., Haberfelner H., Pichler M., Kostić D., Moroz G. V. (2020) Combined Combustion of Various Industrial Waste Flows in Boiler Furnaces. Part 2. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering As-sociations. 63 (6), 526–540 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-6-526-540

18. . ANSYS FLUENT, 14.5. (2014) Theory Guide. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA: ANSYS, Inc., 2616.

19. Filkoski R. V., Petrovski I. J., Karas P. (2006) Optimisation of Pulverised Coal Combustion by Means of CFD/CTA Modelling. Thermal Science, 10 (3), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI0603161F

20. Engineering Simulation ANSYS. Available at: https://www.ansys.com/ (accessed 12 March 2018) ; 3D Design Products. Available at: https://www.ansys.com/products/3d-design ((accessed 12 March 2018).

21. Kuznetsov N. V., Mitor V.V., Dubovskii I. E., Karasina E. S. (eds.) (1973) Thermal Calcula-tion of Boilers (Standard Method). Moscow, Energiya Publ. 296 (in Russian).

22. Sedov L. I. (1972) Similarity and Dimensionality Methods in Mechanics. Moscow, Nauka Publ. 440 (in Russian).

23. Kutateladze S. S., Lyakhovskii D. N., Permyakov V. A. (1966) Modeling of Thermal Power Equipment. Moscow-Leningrad, Energiya Pibll. 351 (in Russian).

24. Arkhipov A. M., Lipov Yu. M., Prokhorov V. B. (2013) The Use of Direct-Flow Burners and Nozzles in Boiler Furnaces: Innovative Experience of MPEI. Moscow, MPEI Publ. 240 (in Russian).