Preview

Determination of Steel Losses and Optimization of the Thickness of the Transformer Magnetic Conductor Sheets

https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2022-65-1-115-126

Abstract

Currently, transformer manufacturers are tasked with creating energy-efficient devices with a reduction of steel losses of up to 44 %. Appropriate theoretical developments are needed for its implementation. With a reduction of eddy-current losses, caused, for example, by reduction of decrease in the thickness of the magnetic conductor sheets, hysteresis losses simultaneously increase. A similar effect is caused by changing the size of the crystal grain of steel, thermomagnetic treatment and other technological impacts. In this regard, the exact determination of the components of total losses in steel is an urgent problem, the solution of which would minimize total losses. The article analyzes the expressions that determine the specific losses for eddy currents and hysteresis through the parameters of the magnetic circuit, and states that this technique is too complicated for engineering calculations. Since eddy current losses are proportional to the square of the frequency, and hysteresis losses are proportional to the frequency in the first degree, simple calculated expressions of eddy current and hysteresis losses have been obtained using the wattmetric method. Based on the fact that the dependence of the magnetization loss on the thickness of the magnetic conductor plates is a decreasing linear function, and the eddy current loss is an ascending parabolic function, an expression of the optimal thickness of the plates has been found, the implementation of which makes the losses of steel minimal. This information will make it possible to minimize total steel losses more effectively by varying the design parameters and the material of the magnetic conductor. It is shown that the charted idling losses of transformers manufactured by different manufacturers differ by more than 30 % and can be rounded and underestimated; therefore it is advisable to obtain this parameter as a result of an experiment (idling experiment).

About the Author

S. M. Plotnikov
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology; Krasnoyarsk Rail Transport Institute
Russian Federation

Address for correspondence
Plotnikov Sergey M. –
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology,
82, Mira Ave., 660049, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation.
Tel.: +7 391 227-57-67
smplotnikov@rambler.ru



References

1. Zhezhelenko I. V. (2018) The Main Directions of Improving the Efficiency of Production, Transmission and Distribution of Electrical Energy. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 61 (1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2018-61-1-28-35 (in Russian).

2. Organization Standard of the Rosseti PJSC. STO 34.01-3.2-011–2017. Power Distribution Transformers 6–10 kV of Capacity of 63–2500 kVA. Requirements for the Level of Loss of Idling Speed and Short Circuit. Available at: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293734/4293734162.pdf (in Russian).

3. Anishchenko V. A., Gorokhovik I. V. (2018) Influence of Oil-Filled Transformers Overload Capacity on the Throughput Capacity of the Electrical Network. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 61 (4), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2018-61-4-310-320 (in Russian).

4. Najafi А., Iskender I. (2018) Comparison of Core Loss and Magnetic Flux Distribution in Amorphous and Silicon Steel Core Transformers. Electrical Engineering, 100 (2), 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-017-0574-7.

5. Heydari А., Taghikhani M. A. (2018) Electromagnetic-Mechanical-Thermal Amorphous Core Transformer Simulation Compare to Conventional Transformers Using FEM. Modares Mechanical Engineering, 18 (3), 95–106.

6. Tatevosyan A. S., Tatevosyan А. А., Zaharova N. V. (2016) The Study of the Electrical Steel and Amorphous Ferromagnets Magnetic Properties. Procedia Engineering, 152, 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.681.

7. Liu Y., Zhu Ch., Jia J., Wang Y., Liu Y., Li G. (2019) Effect of Normalizing Annealing Temperature on Precipitates and Texture of Nb-Cr-Bearing Decarburized Grain-Oriented Silicon Steels. Metals, 9 (4), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9040457.

8. Kostinskiy S. S. (2018) The Review of the Condition of Branch of Transformer Manufacture and Tendencies of Development of the Design of Power Transformers. Power Engineering: Research, Equipment, Technology, 20 (1–2), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2018-20-1-2-14-32 (in Russian).

9. Guan W., Zhang D., Yang M., Gao Y., Muramatsu K. (2018) Hybrid Laminated Iron Core Models Based on Isotropic and Anisotropic Silicon Steels. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices (ASEMD), 2018, 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEMD.2018.8559039.

10. Guan W., Zhang D., Yang M., Zhu Y., Gao Y., Muramatsu K. (2019) Flux and Loss Distribution in Iron Cores With Hybrid T-Joint. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 29 (2), 1–4, Art No 0602104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2019.2894947.

11. Krug K. A. (1936) Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering. Moscow–Leningrad, ONTI Publ. 890 (in Russian).

12. Timofeev I. A. (2007) Specific Losses in Ferromagnet. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education, (6, Part 1), 136–142. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=753 (Accessed 5 April 2020) (in Russian).

13. Mishin D. D. (1991) Magnetic Materials. Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola Publ. 384 (in Russian).

14. Druzhinin V. V. (1974) Magnetic Properties of Electrotechnical Steel. Moscow, Energiya Publ. 239 (in Russian).

15. Blashkin A. T. (ed.) (1986) General Electrical Engineering. Leningrad, Energoatomizdat Publ. 392 (in Russian).

16. Chechernikov V. I. (1969) Magnetic Measurements. Moscow, Moscow State University. 228 (in Russian).

17. Jurzitza D. (2004) Verfahren zum Testen eines Transformators und Entsprechende Testvorrichtung: European Patent No 1398644А1 (in German).

18. Bogoroditsky N. P., Pasynkov V. V., Tareev B. M. (1985) Electrotechnical Materials. Leningrad, Energoatomizdat Publ. 304 (in Russian).

19. Plotnikov S. M., Kolmakov V. O. (2020) Minimization of Losses in the Magnetic Circuit Due to Optimal Thickness of Plates. Journal of Advanced Research in Technical Science, (19), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.26160/2474-5901-2020-19-39-42.

20. Tsykin G. S. (1955) Low Frequency Transformers. Moscow, Svyaz’izdat Publ. 424 (in Russian).

21. Plotnikov S. M. (2021) Method for Determining Optimal Thickness of Sheets of Magnetic Core of Transformer: Patent No 2752353 of Russian Federation (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Plotnikov S.M. Determination of Steel Losses and Optimization of the Thickness of the Transformer Magnetic Conductor Sheets. ENERGETIKA. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations. 2022;65(2):115-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2022-65-1-115-126

Views: 506


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-7448 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0341 (Online)