An Artificial Neural Network Developed in MATLAB-Simulink for Reconstruction a Distorted Secondary Current Waveform. Part 1
https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2021-64-6-479-491
Abstract
Recently, there has been an increased interest in the use of artificial neural networks in various branches of the electric power industry including relay protection. Аrtificial neural networks are one of the fastest growing areas in artificial intelligence technology. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the use of аrtificial neural networks in the electric power engineering, including relay protection. Existing microprocessor-based relay protection devices use a traditional digital signal processing of the monitored signals which is reduced to a multiplying the values of successive samples of the monitored current and voltage signals by predetermined coefficients in order to calculate their RMS values. In this case, the calculated RMS values often do not reflect the real processes occurring in the protected electrical equipment due to, for example, current transformer saturation because of the DC component presence in the fault current. When the current transformer is saturated, its secondary current waveform has a characteristic non-periodic distorted form, which is significantly differs from its primary (true) waveform, which causes underestimation of the calculated RMS value of the secondary current compared to its true value. In its turn, this causes to a trip time delay or even to a relay protection devices operation failure. The use of аrtificial neural networks in conjunction with a traditional digital signal processing provides a different approach to the functioning of both the measuring and logical parts of the microprocessor-based relay protection devices, which significantly increases the speed and reliability of such relay protection devices in comparison with their traditional implementation. A possible application of the аrtificial neural networks for the relay protection purposes is the fault occurrence detection and its type identification, current transformer secondary current waveform distortion restoration due to its saturation up to its true value, detection the distorted and undistorted sections of the current transformer secondary current waveform during its saturation, primary power equipment abnormal operating modes detection, for example, power transformer magnetizing current inrush. The article describes in detail the stages of the practical implementation of the аrtificial neural networks in the MATLAB-Simulink environment by the example of its use to restore the distorted current transformer secondary current waveform due to saturation.
About the Authors
Yu. V. RumiantsevBelarus
Minsk
F. A. Romaniuk
Belarus
Address for correspondence: Romaniuk Fiodar A. – Belаrusian National Technical University, 65/2, Nezavisimosty Ave., 220013, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. Tel.: +375 17 331-00-51
faromanuk@bntu.by
References
1. Shalin A. I. (2002) Reliability and Diagnostics of Relay Protection of Power Systems. Novosibirsk, NSTU. 383 pp. (in Russian)
2. Romaniuk F. A., Rumiantsev Yu. V., Rumiantsev V. Yu., Novash I. V. (2021) Improvement of Algorithm for Formation of Orthogonal Components of Input Quantities in Microprocessor Protection. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 64 (2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2021-64-2-95-108 (in Rus-sian).
3. Romaniuk F. A., Rumiantsev Yu. V., Rumiantsev V. Yu., Novash I. V. (2021) Formation of Orthogonal Components of Input Currents in Microprocessor Protections of Electrical Equipment. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Asso-ciations, 64 (3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2021-64-3-191-201 (in Rus-sian).
4. Pan J., Vu K., Hu Y. (2004) An Efficient Compensation Algorithm for Current Transformer Saturation Effects. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 19 (4), 1623–1628. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2004.835273.
5. Villamagna N., Crossley P. (2006) A CT Saturation Detection Algorithm Using Symmetrical Components for Current Differential Protection. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 21 (1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2005.848654.
6. Wiszniewski A., Rebizant W., Schiel L. (2008) Correction of Current Transformer Transient Performance. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 23 (2), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2008.915832.
7. Haykin S. (2010) Neural Networks and Learning Machines. 3rd ed. Pearson Education India. 936.
8. Cybenko G. (1989) Approximation by Superpositions of a Sigmoidal Function. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 2 (4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02551274
9. Neural Network Toolbox. User’s Guide. Version 4. The MathWorks, 2002. Available at: http://cda.psych.uiuc.edu/matlab_pdf/nnet.pdf
10. Hagan M. Т., Demuth H. B., Beale M. H., Jes O. D. (2014) Neural Network Design. 2nd ed. Boston, PWS Publishing. 1012.
11. Medvedev V. S., Potemkin V. G. (2002) Neural Network. MATLAB 6. Moscow, Dialog-MIFI Publ. 496 pp. (in Russian)
12. Rebizant W., Szafran J., Wiszniewski A. (2011) Digital Signal Processing in Power System Protection and Control. London, Springer Publ. 316.
13. Yu D. C., Cummins J. C., Wang Z., Yoon H. J., Kojovic L. A. (2011) Correction of Current Transformer Distorted Secondary Currents Due to Saturation Using Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 16 (2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.915481.
14. Khorashadi-Zadeh H., Sanaye-Pasand M. (2005) Correction of Saturated Current Transformers Secondary Current Using ANNs. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 21 (1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2005.858799.
15. Feser K., Braun U., Engler F., Maier A. (1991) Application of Neural Networks in Numerical Busbar Protection Systems (NBPS). Proceedings of the First International Forum on Applica-tions of Neural Networks to Power Systems, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANN.1991.213508
16. Lukowicz M., Rosolowski E. (2004) Artificial Neural Network Based Dynamic Compensation of Current Transformer Errors. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Short-Circuit Currents in Power Systems, 19–24.
17. Haghjoo F., Pak M. H. (2015) Compensation of CT Distorted Secondary Current Waveform in Online Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 31 (2), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2448634.
18. Saha M. M., Izykowski J., Lukowicz M., Rosolowski E. (2001) Application of ANN Methods for Instrument Transformer Correction in Transmission Line Protection. Developments in Power System Protection, 7th International Conference, 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:20010160.
19. Cummins, J. C., Yu D. C., Kojovic L. A. (2000) Simplified Artificial Neural Network Structure with the Current Transformer Saturation Detector Provides a Good Estimate of Primary Cur-rents. Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 3, 1373–1378. https://doi.org/10.1109/pess.2000.868725
20. SimPowerSystems. User’s Guide. Version 5. The MathWorks, 2011. Available at: https://all-guidesbox.com/manual/545991/matlab-simpowersystems-5-operation-user-s-manual-403.html
21. Novash I. V., Rumiantsev Yu. V. (2015) A Simplified Model of Three-Phase Bank of Current Transformers in the Dynamic Simulation System. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, (5), 23–38 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Rumiantsev Yu.V., Romaniuk F.A. An Artificial Neural Network Developed in MATLAB-Simulink for Reconstruction a Distorted Secondary Current Waveform. Part 1. ENERGETIKA. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations. 2021;64(6):479-491. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2021-64-6-479-491