Experiments and Computational Research of Biomass Pyrolysis in a Cylindrical Reactor

The article features an experimental study of thermally thin biomass samples (beech wood particles 17×8×6 mm) pyrolysis in a laboratory scale batch reactor. The reactor was a cylindrical steel body with internal diameter of 200 mm and height of 500 mm. The temperature of a lateral surface of the cylinder during the experiment was being kept constant (550 °C) due to electrical heating. The initial loading of the apparatus was about 4 kg with moisture content of about 14 % by weight. During the experiment, the temperature values of the material being pyrolyzed were recorded at two points of the radial coordinate, viz. at the wall of the apparatus and on its axis. A one-dimensional numerical model of the nonstationary process of biomass conversion (heat and mass transfer in combination with the Avrami – Erofeev reaction model) has been proposed and verified. The reactor is represented as a set of a countable number of cylindrical layers, considered as cells (representative meso-volumes) with an ideal mixing of the properties inside. The cylindrical surfaces that form cells are considered to be isothermal. The size of the cells is chosen to be sufficiently large in comparison with the individual particles of the layer, which makes it possible to consider the temperature field inside the cell volume as monotonic. The evolution of the temperature distribution over the radius of a cylindrical reactor is determined on the basis of a difference approximation of the process of non-stationary thermal conductivity. The calculated forecasts and experimental data showed a good agreement, which indicates the adequacy of the developed mathematical model of pyrolysis and makes it possible to recommend it for engineering calculations of biomass pyrolysis. This model can also be useful in improving the understanding of the basic physical and chemical processes occurring in the conditions of biomass pyrolysis.

1. Korsak E. P. (2019) Formation of the System of Threats to Energy Security of the Republic of Belarus. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 62 (4), 388–398 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2019-62-4-388-398

2. Fortov V. E., Popel’ O. S. (2014) The Current Status of the Development of Renewable Energy Sources Worldwide and in Russia. Teploenergetika = Thermal engineering, 61 (6), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0040601514060020

3. Losiuk Y. A., Gibric S. V., Korchinenko S. V. (2008) Some Aspects of Thermochemical Decomposition of Peat. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, (5), 60–66 (in Russian).

4. Malko M. V., Vasilevich S. V. (2019) Kinetics of Pyrolysis of Wood Biomass under Isothermal Conditions. Vestsi Natsyyanal’nai akademii navuk Belarusi. Seryya fizika-technichnych navuk = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Physical-technical series, 64 (3), 321–331 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29235/1561-8358-2019-64-3-321-331

5. Vasilevich S. V., Malko M. V., Degterov D. V., Asadchyi A. N. (2020) Computational Study of the Yield of Solid Wood Pyrolysis Products under High Pressure. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 63 (3), 253–263 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-3-253-263

6. Gidaspow D. (1994) Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions. San Diego, Academic Press Publ. 467. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21244-X

7. Hoef van der M. A., Ye M., Sint Annaland van M., Andrews A. T., Sundaresan S., Kuipers J. A. M. (2006) Multiscale Modeling of Gas-Fluidized Beds. Advances in Chemical Engineering, 31, 65–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2377(06)31002-2

8. Deen N. G., Sint Annaland van. M., Hoef van der M.A., Kuipers J.A.M. (2007) Review of Discrete Particle Modeling of Fluidized Beds. Chemical Engineering Science, 62 (1–2), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.014

9. Dobrego K. V. (2015) Dolomite Thermal-Decomposition Macrokinetic Models for Evaluation of the Gasgenerators Sorbent Systems. Enеrgеtika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, (5), 51–59 (in Russian).

10. Babkin V. A., Nikolaevskii V. N. (2011) Turbulent Fluid Flows in a Circular Pipe and Plane Channel and Models of Mesoscale Turbulence. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 84 (2), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-011-0489-5

11. Ge W., Wang W., Yang N., Li J., Kwauk M., Chen F. [et al.] (2011) Meso-Scale Oriented Simulation Towards Virtual Process Engineering (VPE) – The EMMS Paradigm. Chemical Engineering Science, 66 (19), 4426–4458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.029

12. Dai Q., Chen C., Qi H. (2016) Influence of Meso-Scale Structures on Drag in Gas-Solid Fluidized Beds. Powder Technology. 288, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.031.

13. Mitrofanov A., Mizonov V., Camelo A., Tannous K. (2019) Application of the Theory of Markov Chains to Theoretical Study of Processes in a Circulating Fluidized Bed. Particulate Science and Technology, 37 (8), 1032–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2018.1525459

14. Mitrofanov A., Mizonov V., Shuina E., Kasatkina N., Shpeynova N. (2019) Theoretical and Experimental Study of Particulate Solids Drying in Circulating Fluidized Bed. JP Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 18 (2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.17654/hm018020267

15. Zhukov V. P., Belyakov A. N. (2017) Simulation of Combined Heterogeneous Processes Based on Discrete Models of the Boltzmann Equation. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 51 (1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0040579517010158

16. Pozzobon V., Salvador S., Bézian J. J., El-Hafi M., Le Maoult Y., Flamant G. (2014) Radiative Pyrolysis of Wet Wood under Intermediate Heat Flux: Experiments and Modelling. Fuel Processing Technology, 128, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.007

17. Bryden K. M., Hagge M. J. (2003) Modeling the Combined Impact of Moisture and Char Shrinkage on the Pyrolysis of a Biomass Particle. Fuel, 82 (13), 1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(03)00108-x

18. Lu H., Robert W., Peirce G., Ripa B., Baxter L. L. (2008) Comprehensive Study of Biomass Particle Combustion. Energy and Fuels, 22 (4), 2826–2839. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800006z

19. Fatehi, H., Bai X. S. (2014) A Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Biomass Combustion. Combustion Science and Technology, 186 (4-5), 574–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2014.883255

20. Mujumdar A. S. (ed.) (2006) Handbook of Industrial Drying. 3rd Ed. New York, CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. 1278 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420017618

21. Vasilevich S. V., Malko M. V., Bahach U. N., Degterev D. V., Asadchyi A. N. (2017) Study of the Process of Charcoal Producing by Pyrolysis under Pressure. Vestsi Natsyyanal’nai akademii navuk Belarusi. Seryya fizika-technichnych navuk = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Physical-technical series, (3), 64–71 (in Russian).