Preview

Energy Efficiency of a Small Bioreactor in Various Climatic Zones

https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-4-355-364

Abstract

The authors proposed a model for estimating the heat balance and energy efficiency of a bioreactor that makes possible for a small-sized reactor operating on a relatively low-energy substrate to determine the critical volume, under which the existing climatic conditions allow year-round fully autonomous operation of the digester, as well as for evaluation the potential energy efficiency of such a bioreactor (output commodity heat). For the numerical characteristics of the climatic zone, it is proposed to use the average annual temperature and/or the “degree-day of the heating period” (DDHP) indicator common in construction heat engineering; the DDHP value more adequately characterizing the unevenness of the average monthly temperature distribution, i.e. degree of climate continentality. At the same time, the value of the critical volume of the bioreactor, at which year-round autonomous operation of the digester operating on the municipal sewage sludge, is possible, varies from 7.5 (Vladikavkaz, DDHP = 3410) to 17.0 m3 (Tomsk, DDHP = 6938), i. e. increases almost in proportion to the degree-day of the heating period. It should be noted that when using a substrate with a high biogas yield, e. g., pig manure (a biogas yield of 40 g/kg is adopted), the critical volume in all cases is less than 1 m3. Such results are relevant only for relatively low-energy raw materials. The nature of changes in the output of commodity heat, depending on the volume of the bioreactor and climatic conditions, is quite expectable, viz. the amount of heat that is useful for business interests is higher, the higher is the reactor volume and the milder is the climate. However, when the reactor volume is less than 5 m3, the non-linearity of the graphs is much higher, i. e. for a designer of especially small bioreactors, it seems mandatory to carry out such calculations. The obtained numerical values can be useful both for the designer of bioreactors and for the customer of the project when evaluating the economic efficiency of the planned new innovations.

About the Authors

V. g Isakov
Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

Address for correspondence: Isakov Vitaliy G. – Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University, 7, Studencheskaya str., 426069, Izhevsk, Russian Federation. Tel.: 8 3412 77-60-55

vodosnab@istu.ru


A. A. Abramova
Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
 Izhevsk


M. Yu. Dyagelev
Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
 Izhevsk


References

1. Khroustalev B. M., Pekhota A. N. (2017) Solid Fuel of Hydrocarbon, Wood and Agricultural Waste for Local Heat Supply Systems. Energetika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of the CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Association, 60 (2), 147–158 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2017-60-2-147-158.

2. Osipov S. N., Zakharenko A. V. (2019) Improving the Efficiency of Heat Power Generation from Household Drains. Energetika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of the CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Association, 62 (5), 482–498 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2019-62-5-482-498.

3. Tirshu M., Konstantinov N., Uzun M. (2008) Complex Biopower Installation. Problemy Regional'noi Energetiki = Problems of the Regional Energetics, (3), 78–85 (in Russian).

4. Isakov V. G., Svalova M. V., Abramova A. A., Nepogodin A. M. (2018) Heat Balance and Energy Efficiency of a Bioreactor in a Harsh Climate. Intellektual’nye Sistemy v Proizvodstve = Intelligent Systems in Manufacturing, 16 (4), 154–162 (in Russian).

5. Kononova E. A., Svalova M. V., Nepogodin A. M. Mathematical Modeling of the Process of Mixing the Substrate During Anaerobic Digestion in the Biorector. Intellektual’nye Sistemy v Proizvodstve = Intelligent Systems in Manufacturing, 25 (1), 15–18 (in Russian).

6. The Possibility of Introducing at the Poultry Farm an Innovative Technology for Producing Energy and Heat. Biogas Plant. Available at: https://studbooks.net/1233496/agropromyshlennost/biogazovaya_ustanovka. (Accessed 14.09.2018) (in Russian).

7. SNiP [Building Codes and Regulations] 23-02–2003. Thermal Protection of Buildings. Moscow, The State Construction Committee of Russia, 2004. 31 (in Russian).

8. Updated Version of SNiP [Building Codes and Regulations] 23-01–99* (with Changes No 1, 2): SP 131.13330.2012. Construction Climatology. Moscow, Ministry of Construction, 2015. 124 (in Russian).

9. Severilov P. Biogas for Dummies. Available at: http://www.betontrans.ru/construction/bio gas_1.htm. (Accessed 12.10.2018) (in Russian).

10. Production of Biogas from Waste of the Forest and Processing Industry. Ministry of Economic Development of the Kirov Region. Available at: https://invest.kirovreg.ru/investments/innovatsionnaya-politika/innovatsionnye-proekty/proizvodstvo-biogaza.php?special=Y (Accessed 20.09.2018) (in Russian).

11. Baader W., Dohne E., Brenndorfer M. (1978) Biogas in Theorie und Praxis [Biogas: Theory and Practice]. Darmstadt, Kranichstein. (in German).

12. Ignatov D. V. (2002) Mathematical Modeling of the Periodic Process of Anaerobic Fermenting of Substrates. Voronezh, Voronezh State Technological Academy. 22 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Isakov V.g., Abramova A.A., Dyagelev M.Yu. Energy Efficiency of a Small Bioreactor in Various Climatic Zones. ENERGETIKA. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations. 2020;63(4):355-364. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-4-355-364

Views: 803


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-7448 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0341 (Online)