Maintaining the Sustainable Energy Systems: Turning from Cost to Value

The economies of the world are influenced by the rapidly changing global energy policy agenda. Understanding energy trends implications in the long-term perspective is crucial for responsible and informed sustainability-policy making, with respect to transformations required to enhance the security of energy supply, resource efficiency and affordability, as well to as transformations required to minimize energy poverty and mitigate ecological footprint. Nowadays the price (value) competitiveness of technologies and products as their ability to respond to sustainability demands is becoming the appreciable criterion in choosing the pathways of technological growth or economic strategies designing. The transition to energy sustainability is the so-called quiet energy [r]evolution, or the transition towards 100 % renewable energy supply. Using the sociotechnical transition, vulnerability and sustainable development theories for the assessment of the energy safety level, this article aims to contribute to the understanding of cultural, institutional and innovation prerequisites of sustainable energy transitions. Basing on historical examples, it argues that, despite the cultural dimensions, energy resources and energy mix disparity, geographic location and income per capita, the value instead of cost philosophy in choosing energy pathways maintains the sustainable energy transitions. The key findings are the defined prerequisites of energy transitions sustainability; among them there are cultural dimensions, innovations and the speeds of movement along learning curves when adopting new energy technologies as well as energy policy patterns, applied in a country: value versus cost-driven. The Value vs Cost Energy Policy matrix has been developed in order to determine if a country is sufficiently value-driven in its energy policy.

1. Kilievich O. (1999). State Policy Analysis: Microeconomic View. Part1. Modern Economic Theory and State Finances. Kyiv, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).

2. Cherp A., Jewell J. (2014). The Concept of Energy Security: Beyond the Four As. Energy Poicy, 75, 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005

3. IEA/OECD (2012). World Energy Outlook 2012: Executive Summary. Available: https://ru.scribd.com/document/124814693/IEA-World-Energy-Outlook-2012 (accessed 12 February 2019).

4. Potapenko V., Podolets R., Mukhin V. (2013). Organizational and Economic Mechanisms of Balance of Interests in the Energy Sector of Ukraine. Efektivna ekonomіka [Efficient Economics], (11). Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=2451. (accessed 30 December 2019) (in Ukrainian).

5. Geels F., Schot J. (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36 (3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

6. Cherp A., Vinichenko V., Jewell J., Suzuki M., Antal M. (2017). Comparing Electricity Transitions: a Historical Analysis of Nuclear, Wind and Solar Power in Germany and Japan. Energy Policy, 101, p. 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.044

7. Coenen L., Benneworth P., Truffer B. (2012). Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy, 41 (6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014

8. Hauff A., Bode D., Neumann F., Haslauer F. (2014). Global Energy Transitions. A Comparative Analysis of Key Countries and Implications for the International Energy Debate. Berlin, Weltenergierat – Deutschland. 30 pp.

9. International Energy Agency (2016) Next Generation Wind and Solar Power. Full Report. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258969-en

10. Araujo K. (2014). The Emerging Field of Energy Transitions: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002

11. Coenen, L., Diaz Lopez, F. J. (2009). Comparing Systems Approaches to Innovation and Technological Change for Sustainable and Competitive Economies: an Explorative Study into Conceptual Commonalities, Differences and Complementarities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.003.

12. Turnheim B., Berkhout F., Geels F., Hof A., McMeekin A., Nykvist B., van Vuuren D.P. (2015). Evaluating Sustainability Transitions Pathways: Bridging Analytical Approaches to Address Governance Challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010.

13. World Energy Council (2018) Energy Sustainability Trilemma Index 2018. Available at: https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/World-Energy-Trilemma-Index-2018.pdf. (accessed 30 December 2019).

14. Hofstede Insights. Country Comparison. Available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison. (accessed 10 February 2019).

15. Porter M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 73-91.

16. Dipaola A. (2017). OPEC’s Top Producer is Turning to Wind and Solar Power. Bloomberg. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-14/saudis-warm-to-solar-as-opec-s-top-producer-aims-to-help-exports (accessed 30 December 2019).

17. International Energy Agency (2015) Energy Policies Beyond IEA Countries: Indonesia 2015. Energy Policies Beyond IEA Countries. Paris, IEA, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065277-en

18. Dearing A. (2000). Sustainable Innovation: Drivers and Barriers. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/2105727.pdf. (accessed 30 December 2019).

19. Mulder K. F. (2007) Innovation for sustainable development: from environmental design to transition management. Sustainable Science, 2 (2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0036-7

20. International Energy Agency (2000) Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. Paris, IEA. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264182165-en

21. International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV) (2017). Results 2016, Including Maturity Report. https://www.worldfutureenergysummit.com/__media/libraries/products/A493E2AF-5056-B73B-0D765674956C42F6-pdf.pdf

22. Mattsson N., Wene C. O. (1997). Assessing New Energy Technologies Using an Energy System Model with Endogenized Experience Curves. International Journal of Energy Research, 21 (4), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-114x(19970325)21:4<385::aid-er275>3.0.co;2-1

23. Goulder L., Mathai K. (2000). Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39 (1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1089

24. Nordhaus W. D. (2009) The Perils of the Learning Model for Modeling Endogenous Technological Change. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14638

25. International Energy Agency (2016) Energy Technology Perspectives 2016. Towards Sustainable Urban Energy Systems: Executive Summary. https://doi.org/10.1787/energy_tech-2016-en

26. Canton J., Johannesson Linden A. (2010). Support Schemes for Renewable Electricity in the EU. Economic Papers 408. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2010/pdf/ecp408_en.pdf (accessed 03 January 2020).

27. Kagan J. (2019). Learning Curve. Investopedia. Available at: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/learning-curve.asp#ixzz4WmWb9fM0 (accessed 10 February 2019).

28. Greenpeace International, Global Wind Energy Council Solar Powereurope (2015) Energy [R]evolution. A Sustainable World Energy Outlook 2015. 100% renewable energy for all. Available at: https://www.duesseldorf.greenpeace.de/sites/www.duesseldorf.greenpeace.de/files/greenpeace_energy-revolution_erneuerbare_2050_20150921.pdf. (accessed 03 January 2020).

29. IEA/OECD (2008). Renewable Energy Essentials: Wind. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-essentials-wind (accessed 03 January 2020).

30. Rubin E., Azevedo I., Jaramillo P., Yeh S. (2015). A Review of Learning Rates for Electricity Supply Technologies. Energy Policy, 86, 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.011

31. The Statistics Portal. Global Cumulative Installed Wind Power Capacity from 2001 to 2018 (in megawatts). Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/268363/installed-wind-power-capacity-worldwide/ (accessed 10.02.2019).

32. Junginger M., Faaij A., Turkenburg W. (2005) Global Experience Curves for Wind Farms. Energy Policy, 33 (2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00205-2

33. Chazov E. L., Grakhov V. P., Krivorotov V. V., Simchenko O. L. (2019) Improving the Efficiency of Planning as a Basis for Management the Investment Activity of an Industrial Enterprise. Energetika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of the CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 62 (1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2019-62-1-88100 (in Russian).