References

energy

Энергетика. Известия высших учебных заведений и энергетических объединений СНГ

ENERGETIKA. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations

1029-74482414-0341

BNTU

10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-4-312-327

energy-1977

Research Article

ОБЩАЯ ЭНЕРГЕТИКА

GENERAL POWER ENGINEERING

Устойчивые энергетические трансформации: нивелирование негативных экстерналий

Sustainable Energy Transitions: Overcoming Negative Externalities

Письменная

У. Е.

Pysmenna

U. Yе.

Адрес для переписки: Письменная Ульяна Евгеньевна – Институт экономики и прогнозирования Национальной академии наук Украины, ул. Панаса Мирного, 26, 01011, г. Киев, Украина. Тел.: +380 442 80-84-65uliamyxa@gmail.com

Address for correspondence: Pysmenna Uliana Yе. – Institute for Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 26, Panasa Myrnoho str., 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine. Tel.: +380 442 80-84-65

uliamyxa@gmail.com

Трипольская

Г. С.

Trypolska

G. S.

Институт экономики и прогнозирования Национальной академии наук Украины; Национальный технический университет Украины «Киевский политехнический институт имени Игоря Сикорского»УкраинаInstitute for Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”Ukraine

Институт экономики и прогнозирования Национальной академии наук УкраиныУкраинаInstitute for Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of UkraineUkraine

2020

07082020

634312327

2020

Письменная У.Е., Трипольская Г.С.

Pysmenna U.Y., Trypolska G.S.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://energy.bntu.by/jour/article/view/1977

В настоящее время мировая энергетическая система сталкивается с многочисленными переходами и сдвигами существующих социально-технических режимов в сторону повышения устойчивости. Наряду с этим такие устойчивые трансформации часто откладываются, замедляются или отклоняются, чтобы избежать негативных внешних факторов, которые могут угрожать стабильности системы. Авторы статьи постарались донести более глубокое понимание внешних эффектов (экстерналий) энергетических трансформаций и уязвимости энергетических систем под воздействием негативных внешних факторов, вызванных устойчивыми энергетическими трансформациями. Используя теорию экстерналий (Баумоль, Оутс), теорию социотехнических трансформаций Гилса, а также метод трилеммы энергетической устойчивости для оценки устойчивости энергетических систем, можно утверждать, что такие внешние эффекты должны быть подвержены специальным мерам энергетической политики, отличным от общепринятых (классических) способов, которые могут привести к замедлению устойчивых трансформаций в энергетике и создать для них дополнительные барьеры. Рассмотрен переход к более чистым и низкоуглеродным энергетическим системам, использующим такие энергетические технологии, как солнечная энергия, энергия ветра, малая гидроэнергетика, биомасса, утилизация отходов, электронные транспортные средства. Проведена классификация широкого спектра методов политики (классических и новых), применяемых по отдельности и одновременно, выполнен анализ их использования при разработке энергетической политики, направленной на борьбу с негативными побочными эффектами трансформаций на пути к энергетической устойчивости во всем мире, которые можно минимизировать с помощью надлежащим образом разработанной энергетической политики каждой страны.

Nowadays the world energy system faces numerous transitions and shifts of the existing socio-technical regimes towards higher sustainability. Along with it, the sustainable transitions are often being postponed, slowed down or rejected to avoid negative externalities that could threaten the system stability. In this study, we aim to reach the deeper understanding of the externalities of energy transitions and the vulnerability of energy systems under the influence of negative externalities caused by sustainable energy transitions. Using the Externality theory (Baumol, Oates), Sociotechnical transition theory (Geels), as well as Energy sustainability Trilemma Method for the evaluation of the sustainability of energy systems we argue that such externalities need to be treated (internalized, avoided) by special policy measures other than common (classical) ways which may cause slowing down of sustainability transitions and make extra barriers for them. Transitions to more clean and low-carbon energy systems using energy technologies such as solar, wind, small hydro, biomass, waste management, e-vehicles are in the scope of this paper. It classifies the wide range of policy methods (classical and new) being applied separately and simultaneously, and analyses their application in energy policies designing aimed to combat negative externalities of energy sustainability transitions worldwide, so they might be minimized by properly tailored energy policy in each particular case.

энергетическая политикаустойчивая трансформациянегативные экстерналии устойчивых трансформацийвозобновляемые источники энергии

energy policysustainability transitionnegative externalities of sustainability transitionsrenewables

References1

Greenpeace International (2015) Energy [R]Evolution. A Sustainable World Energy Outlook 2015. 100 % Renewable Energy for All. Available at: https://issuu.com/greenpeaceinternational/docs/energy-revolution-2015-full-hr.

Biggest World Banks Prohibited Investments into Coal Power Generation and Industry. Elektrovesti.net (15.08.2016). Available at: http://elektrovesti.net/48214_krupneyshie-mirovye-banki-zapretili-investitsii-v-ugolnuyu-generatsiyu-i-promyshlennost (in Russian).

Cordell R., Hedin D., Krahenbuhl J. (2016) Economics of Renewable Energy & Externalities. Available at: https://sites.miis.edu/immersivelearning/files/2016/07/Norway-presentation.pdf.

Markandya A. (2012) Externalities from Electricity Generation and Renewable Energy. Methodology and Application in Europe and Spain. Cuadernos Económicos de ICE, 83. https://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2012.83.6034.

Kemp R. (1994) Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability. The Problem of Technological Regime Shifts. Futures, 26, 1023–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-x.

Hekkert M., Negro S. (2009) Functions of Innovation Systems as a Framework to Understand Sustainable Technological Change: Empirical Evidence for Earlier Claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013.

Foxon T. (2011) A Coevolutionary Framework for Analysing a Transition to a Sustainable Low Carbon Economy. Ecological Economics, 70 (12), 2258–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.014.

Markard J., Raven R., Truffer B. (2012) Sustainability Transitions: Anbemerging Field of Research and its Prospects. Research Policy, 41 (6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.

Zeppini P. (2015) A Discrete Choice Model of Transitions to Sustainable Technologies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 112, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.01.006.

Katz M. L., Shapiro C. (1985) Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.

Unruh G. (2000) Understanding Carbon Lock-in. Energy Policy, 28 (12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7.

Owen A. D. (2006) Renewable Energy: Externality Costs as Market Barriers. Energy Policy, 34 (5), 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.017.

Baumol W. J., Oates W. E., Bawa V. S., Bradford D. F. (1988) The Theory of Environmental Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173513.

Fullerton D., Stavins R. (1998) How Economists See the Environment. Nature, 395 (6701), 433–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/26606.

Gruber J. (2003) Public Finance and Public Policy. Worth Publishers. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/ 5689.001.0001.

Pigou A. C. (1912) Wealth and Welfare [The Economics of Welfare]. London: Macmillan & Co, 1912.

Coase R. H. (1960) The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/4665.

Keppler J. H. (1998) Fixed Costs, Information and Externalities. Kyklos, 51 (4), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1998.tb01436.x.

Peter J. W., Bird N. (1987) The Transferability and Depletability of Externalities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14 (1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(87)90005-2.

Arrow K. J. (1969) The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Non-Market Allocation. The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: the P.P.B. System’ Joint Economic Committee. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 47–66.

Kneese A. K., Clifford S. R. (1987) Environmental Economics. The New Palgrave: a Dictionary of Economics, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_634-1.

Energy Trilemma Index (2016). World Energy Council. Available at: https://trilemma. worldenergy.org/.

Pysmenna U. Ye., Trypolska G. S. (2020) Maintaining the Sustainable Energy Systems: Turning from Cost to Value. Energetika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of the CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 63 (1), 14–29 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2020-63-1-14-29.

Geels F. W., Schot J. (2007) Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36 (3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.

Lucas A., Bonavitacola F., Kotsakis E., Fulli G. (2015) Grid Harmonic Impact of Multiple Electric Vehicle Fast Charging. Electric Power Systems Research. 127, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.012.

Botsford C., Szczepanek A. (2009) Fast Charging vs. Slow Charging: Pros and Cons for the New Age of Electric Vehicles. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/902f/918a01e0d5a54291ea34902328cf40d27840.pdf?ga=2.127447629.1339029295.1594499145-1093527698.1570 376008.

Next Generation Wind and Solar Power: from Cost to Value. IAE, 2016. 40.

Ryabchyn O. (2017) Research of Green Expedition. Available at: http://biz.nv.ua/experts/ryabchin_a/issle-dovanie-zelenoj-ekspeditsii-1194390.html (in Russian).

Foosnæs A. H., Jensen A. N., Niels Chr. (2011) Case Studies of Grid Impacts of Fast Charging. EDISON-Electric Vehicles in a Distributed and Integrated Market Using Sustainable Energy and Oper Networks. Copenhagen.

Etezadi (2009) University of Nevada, Reno. Communication with AeroVironment Staff February. Pre-Published Report on Grid Impacts from Fast Charging.

U. S. Department of Energy (2014) Evaluating Electric Vehicle Charging Impacts and Customer Charging Behaviors – Experience from Six Smart Grid Investment Grant Projects. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/12/f19/SGIG-EvaluatingEVcharging-Dec2014.pdf.

Wilson L. (2013) Shades of Green: Electric Cars’ Carbon Emissions Around the Globe. Avai- lable at: http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Shades-of-Green-Full-Report.pdf.

Crist Ph. (2012) Electric Vehicles Revisited: Costs, Subsidies and Prospects. Discussion Paper No 2012-O3. Available at: http://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/dp201203.pdf.

Abbasi T., Abbasi S. A. (2011) Small Hydropower’s Negative Impact on the Environment. Oil Price.com. Available at: http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Hydroelectric/Small-Hydropowers-Negative-Impact-On-The-Environment.html.

Alcamo J., Moreno J. M., Nováky B., Bindi M., Corobov R., Devoy R. J. N., Giannakopoulos C., Martin E., Olesen J. E., Shvidenko A. (2007) Europe. Parry M. L., Canziani O. F., Paluti- kof J. P., van der Linden P. J., Hanson C. E. (eds.) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 541–580.

ESCO (2006) 2nd National Report of Ukraine on Climate Change. Kyiv. https://allbeton.ru/ upload/iblock/460/vtoroe-nacionalnoe-soobschenie-ukraini-po-voprosam-izmeneniya-klimata.pdf (in Russian).

Manukalo V. (2009) Impacts of Climate Changes in Ukraine on Hydrological Regime and Water Resources: Assessment and Measures of Adaptation. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting. abstract #GC43B-03. Available at: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AGUFMGC43B..03M/abstract.

Jacobson M. Z., Delucchi M. A., Bauer Z. A. F., Goodman S. G., Chapman W. E., Cameron M. A., Bozonnat C. [et al.] (2017) 100 % Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World. Joule, 1 (1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005.

Podderegina L. I. (2005) The Evaluation of the Efficacy of Inter-Industrial Relation Efficiency at Power Enterprises. Energetika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of the CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, (3), 82–87 (in Russian).

Lazarev V. S., Yurik I. V. (2018) Some “Exotic” Information Sources that Have Been Discovered during the Selection of Serial Publications to Support Research in Energy Security, Energy Conservation and Energy Efficiency Technologies and Techniques: Advantageous Addition for “Professional Reading” of a Power Engineering Expert. Energetika. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii i Energeticheskikh Ob’edinenii SNG = Energetika. Proceedings of the CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 61 (2), 167–178 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2018-61-2-167-178.

Dröes M. I., Koster H. R. A. (2016) Renewable Energy and Negative Externalities: the Effect of Wind Turbines on House Prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 96, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.09.001.

Gibbons S. (2014) Gone With the Wind: Valuing the Local Impacts of Wind Turbines Through House Prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 72, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.04.006.

Ladenburg J., Dubgaard A. (2007) Willingness to Pay for Reduced Visual Disamenities from Offshore Wind Farms in Denmark. Energy Policy, 35 (8), 4059–4071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.023.

Hall C., Dale B., Pimentel D. (2011) Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuel. Sustainability, 3 (12), 2413–2432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3122413.

Hall Ch., Lambert J., Balogh St. (2014) EROI of Different Fuels and the Implications for Society. Energy Policy, 64, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049.

Schaffartzik A., Plank C., Brad A. (2014) Ukraine and the Great Biofuel Potential? A Political Material Flow Analysis. Ecological Economics, 104, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2014.04.026.

Energy Balance of Ukraine. Available at: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2012/energ/en_bal/arh_2012.htm. (Аccessed 20 May 2017) (in Ukrainian).

Baral A., Malins C. H. (2016) Additional Supporting Evidence for Significant iLUC Emissions of Oilseed Rape Biodiesel Production in the EU Based on Causal Descriptive Modeling Approach. GCB Bioenergy, 8 (2), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12254.

Geletukha G., Zheliezna T. (2012) Position of Bioenergy in the Draft Updated Energy Strategy of Ukraine Till 2030. Position Paper. Available at: https://img.ukr.bio/data/news/img/20121129/uabio-misce_bioenerfetuku_v_proecti_energetuchnoi_strategii_ukrainu_do_2030.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Fischer G., Prieler S., van Velthuizen H., Berndes G., Faaij A., Londo M., de Wit M. (2010) Biofuel Production Potentials in Europe: Sustainable Use of Cultivated Land and Pastures, Part II: Land Use Scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34 (2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.009.

Trypolska G., Kyryzyuk S. (2018) Development of Ukraine's Bioenergy Sector in the Context of the EU Guidelines. Ekonomìka ì Prognozuvannâ, 2018 (3), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.03.138.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.